Sun. Jun 23rd, 2024

America’s neglected women: anatomy of a unique prison crisis

By knl9j Apr8,2024

The United States of America is home to 30 percent of the world’s female jail population.

Public Senate will be airing the documentary Women in Pain, the Forgotten of America, which was directed by Brice Lambert and will be televised this coming Friday, April 5 in the second part of the evening. This video is a surgical deciphering of a unique issue that was formed from a system that is gravely failing.

Currently, I am a prisoner. My name has been shattered, stolen, and forgotten. This is the number that I will carry with me for the rest of my life: 678712, which is the number of one error. In the beginning of the documentary directed by Brice Lambert, Angelina Jolie reads a poem that she has written or written herself. She is one among the more than 230,000 women who are currently incarcerated in the United States. She is currently being held at Mabel Bassett Prison in McLoud, Oklahoma. This is the category of jail population that is rising at the fastest rate in the country, yet the number of male inmates is dropping. Seven times more numerous than thirty-five years ago, this category of prison population is growing at the fastest rate.

Drawing on the state of Oklahoma as an example, this documentary is sensitive without becoming complacent, and it provides a comprehensive overview of a situation that is both complicated and occasionally absurd. Women are incarcerated in this state for acts of violence committed by their spouse against their children, and the duration of their incarceration can sometimes exceed that of their children. There are also women who are sentenced to prison for putting their unborn child in danger because they sought treatment for their addiction while they were pregnant in the hospital.

For the purposes of this program, everything revolves on the first individuals who are involved; it is their experience that directs the reflection, and their testimonies that decide the structure of the documentary. They represent the truth that lies behind the numbers, and the words that they speak make it possible to determine the factors that led to the failure of the system and the societal implications that resulted from it. By revolving around their own experiences and the experiences of their loved ones, Brice Lambert is able to present a compelling contrast, providing a voice to those who advocate for an extremely coercive system as well as those who are opposed to it.

Most importantly, in spite of the fact that the picture is gloomy, the filmmaker of the documentary investigates potential answers. A number of players, such as Judge Dawn Moody, for instance, advocate for the provision of care, which is less expensive (both socially and economically) than the practice of incarcerating individuals repeatedly. The documentary provides a comprehensive and pertinent summary of this one-of-a-kind problem that is occurring all across the world in a minute and a half.

A project called the Health in Prisons Project was initiated in 1995 by the WHO Regional Office for Europe. This project was sponsored by the WHO Collaborating Centre for Health and Prisons, which is located within the Department of Health in the United Kingdom. There is a network of countries that are committed to protecting and promoting health in prisons. The Project works within this network to protect and promote health in prisons for the benefit of prisoners, staff, and public health.

Approximately 36 countries in the WHO European Region are represented by representatives from their respective ministries that are responsible for health in prisons. These representatives attend the annual conference and network meeting of the Project. Through the combination of shared experiences and the advice of experts, the network generates recommendations for nations that are looking to better.

The provision of health care and the conditions that exist within their jails, as well as the development of their function in the prevention of the transmission of disease. The objective of the network is to make the most of a significant opportunity to improve the health of a marginalized population and to make a contribution to the general public health in the communities in which they are located.

At the request of the Member States that were involved, the WHO Health in Prisons Project, along with partner organizations and experts, and with the support of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, the Quaker Council for European Affairs, the Quaker United Nations Office, the Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health, the AIDS Foundation East-West, and the European Monitoring Center for Drugs and Drug Addiction, has reviewed all of the issues that are affecting women’s health in the criminal justice system. In particular, the project has taken into consideration the gross inequities that exist in women’s health in prisons. The statement and background paper that are enclosed have been accepted by the Project as evidence that fully justifies the suggestions and call for action that are included in its conclusion.

There were variations in the way women were treated based on their ethnicity. Most of the time, wives of Puritan settlers in New England did not participate in the agricultural labor alongside their husbands. On the other hand, a significant number of women in German villages in Pennsylvania were employed in fields and stables. A greater degree of power over property was handed to women by immigrants from Germany and the Netherlands, which was not permitted by the English legislation at the time.

The German and Dutch spouses, in contrast to the English colonial wives, were allowed to own their own clothing and other belongings, and they were also granted the authority to form wills that would dispose of the property that was brought into the marriage. Many factors contributed to the rapid expansion of the New England regional economy throughout the 17th century. These factors included a large number of immigrants, high birth rates, low death rates, and an availability of inexpensive farmland.

[20] [20] In the year 1630, the population was 3000, but by 1640, it had increased to 14,000, then 33,000, then 68,000, and finally 91,000 by the year 1700. Around 20,000 Puritans arrived between the years 1630 and 1643, residing primarily in the vicinity of Boston. After 1643, the number of immigrants arriving each year dropped to less than fifty. The average number of children in a family that was complete between the years 1660 and 1700 was 7.1. The birth rate was around 49 newborns per year for every 1000 people, while the death rate was approximately 22 deaths per year for every 1000 people. There were around 27 percent of the population that consisted of men between the ages of 16 and 60.–Ixg


By knl9j

Related Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *