Sun. Jun 23rd, 2024

POINT OFVIEW. Trump’s foreign policy: November’s uncertainty

By knl9j Apr23,2024

Philippe Le Corre, a professor linked with Essec, provides an analysis that states, “This time again, the Trumpist apparatus appears to be very helpless on questions of foreign policy and defense, which are so important given the involvement of the United States on all continents.”

While the incoming president is putting together his cabinet, a few hints about his mysterious attitude to international affairs are beginning to surface.

Traditionally, by the time modern American presidents receive the keys to the White House, learn the identities of intelligence assets around the world, and obtain the nuclear-weapons codes, they have already been well-defined. This is due to the fact that they have spent a significant amount of time in public service and have also been through a challenging election campaign.

The consistent worldview and governing philosophy that they adhere to has served as the foundation for their positions. The vast number of specialists and advisors who have been drawn to the cause have come to the conclusion that their character judgment is accurate. In comprehensive white papers, they have provided a detailed explanation of their policy perspectives.

By carefully examining their previous votes and their own personal history, their decision-making process has been brought into clearer focus. At the same time, President-elect Donald J. Trump will enter the Oval Office on January 20 as a mystery in many significant respects, despite the fact that he has been the center of attention throughout one of the most closely followed and fiercely contested presidential campaigns in the history of the United States.

Neither a conservative nor a neoconservative, Trump is neither way. He is not a realist, an idealist, or a neo-isolationist in a consistent manner. The only thing that shines through his tightly knit group of devoted assistants and adult offspring is the light of the “army of one” that is at the center of their group.

As the first commander-in-chief of the United States of America who has never served in the government or the military, Trump does not have the kind of biographical paper trail that may bring his hazy convictions into clearer light. It is not nearly as straightforward as that.

In March, Eliot A. Cohen, who is currently the director of the Strategic Studies Program at Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies and was a senior counselor at the State Department during the administration of George W. Bush, was credited with assisting in the organization of a “Never Trump” letter.

This letter was eventually signed by more than 120 former Republican officials and experts in the fields of national security and foreign policy. In his explanation, Cohen stated that Trump does hold certain fundamental beliefs; but, there are not enough of them to provide Americans with a comprehensive picture of his attitudes toward foreign policy. Despite the fact that Trump is not a typical isolationist, Cohen pointed out that he is leery of what he considers to be imbalanced commitments to alliance members.

Trump has a strong belief in the importance of a robust military, but he is disdainful of previous military involvements. As a proponent of Israel, he endorses the choice of the United Kingdom to withdraw from the European Union, and he has an exceptionally high affinity for Vladimir Putin, the strongman of Russia.

According to Cohen, “But none of that amounts to a coherent worldview,” which is one of the challenges you have when analyzing a leader who does not read and does not feel the need to profoundly educate himself on the international system that the United States has constructed over the course of more than half a century.

However, there are significant hints that point to a possible foreign and national security policy that Trump would implement. These hints may be found in his corporate history, in the drama that occurred on the campaign trail, and in the controversial policy views that he has adopted and frequently abandoned.

There are also hints in the rapidly expanding circle of advisers and top officials that he is currently recruiting and appointing. These include retired Lieutenant General Michael Flynn as the national security adviser; Kansas Representative Mike Pompeo as the director of the Central Intelligence Agency;

Alabama Senator Jeff Sessions as the attorney general; Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus as the chief of staff for the White House; and right-wing media mogul and anti-globalist bomb-thrower Steve Bannon as the chief strategist and senior counselor for the White House.–6627965ac4c83#goto6279

By knl9j

Related Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *