Sat. Jun 22nd, 2024

Hamas calls Biden’s Gaza initiative “positive” and challenge Netanyahu’s contradictions.

By knl9j Jun1,2024

Despite his best efforts, the Prime Minister of Israel is hesitant to make a public commitment to a ceasefire. As his agents sit at the table to negotiate, they have a sneaking suspicion that he is “sabotaging” their attempts in order to keep the war going and maintain his position of power.

Benjamin Netanyahu was put in the position of having to confirm, on Friday, May 31, the request for a ceasefire in Gaza that was presented by Joe Biden, the Vice President of the United States. On what grounds could he possibly be opposed to it? There is an Israeli plan here. Mr. Netanyahu thinks back to the fact that he personally gave his negotiators permission to bring it up for discussion. The view that was provided by his most trusted ally is, however, explicitly contradicted by him.

The statement in question, according to Joe Biden, defines a process whose primary objective is to bring an end to the war, as Hamas has demanded. Despite this, Mr. Netanyahu is adamant about not closing this chapter. On the contrary, he asserts that this “deal” would make it possible for Israel to “continue the war until its objectives are achieved, including the destruction of Hamas’ military and governing capabilities.”” Israel is able to respect these principles because the proposal that they have actually put forward, which includes the conditional transition from one phase to the next,” he reiterates.

Several sources close to Israeli negotiators recently told Le Monde, on the condition of anonymity, that the Prime Minister has been “isolated” inside his own government for a number of weeks. The “despair” of Israeli negotiators is fueled by the fact that Mr. Netanyahu is compelled by his own ministers to accept conditions that he then rushes to disrupt and even contradict. According to their assessment, he is “monopolized by his political survival alone.” He is suspected of “sabotaging” their efforts in order to prolong the war and keep power, while at the same time allowing his far-right allies to fantasize about the concept of ethnic cleansing in Gaza and the recolonization of the territory.

Accept the fact that Hamas managed to survive the battle.

According to a summary provided by one of these sources, “the only difference between Israel and Hamas is whether recognition of the end of the war should be expressed or if it should simply take place without being said.” The government, on the other hand, is aware of the fact that an agreement would require “a cessation of all military operations, possibly the withdrawal of troops from Gaza, the release of a certain number of terrorists from Israeli prisons, and at the very least, an implicit acceptance that Hamas is not entirely excluded from the governance of Gaza,” as she defines it.

Ali Ahmed Hassin, a senior field commander within the Radwan force who was comparable to a brigade commander, was verified to have been killed in an airstrike, according to a statement that was issued by the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) on Monday.

It has been determined that Hassin played a significant role in the planning and execution of assaults on northern Israel. Hassin’s involvement in the battle was described by the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) as follows: “As part of his role, he was responsible for the planning and execution of terror attacks in the Ramim Ridge area against the Israeli home front.”

The town of as-Sultaniyah, which is situated in the southern region of Lebanon, was the location of the strike. Hassin was not the only person to be murdered during the airstrike; the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) also alleged that two other Hizbullah fighters who were under his leadership were also slain.

The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) have made an announcement regarding a strategic adjustment in their approach to operations on the northern border with Lebanon. This shift indicates a transition from defensive postures to offensive activities, which comes at a time when engagements with the Lebanese militant group Hizbullah are becoming increasingly intense. This proclamation comes after a period of increased firefights between Israel and Hizbullah, which escalated in the aftermath of Hamas’ strikes on Israel on October 7. These attacks marked a crucial point in the ongoing battles with groups that are supported by Iran.

One of the most important phases of the Israeli Defense Forces’ (IDF) Northern Command’s war preparations has been finished. This phase focused on improving the preparedness of emergency operational depots. Within a relatively short period of time, the rapid mobilization and deployment of forces to the frontline that are equipped for combat is the goal of this project, which attempts to ease the process. The readiness of both regular and reserve units has been underlined, and commanders have indicated that they are prepared to move out “within just a few hours.”

Having released a statement in both English and Arabic, the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) demonstrates a nuanced communication strategy. In contrast to the English version, which places more of an emphasis on “readiness for the transition from defense to offense,” the Arabic version makes a direct reference to the move from defense to offense.–%D9%83%D8%B1%D9%8A%D9%85-%D8%B7%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%B9%D9%8A-%D9%84%D8%AA%D8%AE%D9%81%D9%8A%D9%81-%D8%A2%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%85-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%81%D8%A7/10673171


By knl9j

Related Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *